Are any IEEPA tariffs still being collected?

No. The decision reached every duty imposed under the statute: the border duties on goods of Canada, Mexico and China, and the reciprocal schedule. Customs and Border Protection deactivated the headings in ACE by CSMS 67834313.

What replaced the reciprocal tariffs?

A ten percent import surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed by Proclamation 11012 from 24 February 2026. Section 122 limits a surcharge to 150 days, and it lapsed on 24 July 2026 without extension. Nothing country-wide replaced it except the Section 301 forced-labor action of the same date, which reaches sixty economies at ten or twelve and a half percent.

Which US tariffs are in force today?

11 trade actions as of 2026-09-06: Section 338 duties on goods of Canadian origin; Section 301 forced-labor action across 60 economies; Section 232 semiconductors; Section 232 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and buses; Section 232 timber, lumber and wooden furniture; Section 232 metals: steel, aluminum and copper; Section 232 automobiles and parts; Section 301 China, list 4A; Section 301 China, list 3; Section 301 China, list 2; Section 301 China, list 1. Each adds to the Column 1 rate for the classification, and each is listed with its heading and document on this page.

Why does the Harmonized Tariff Schedule still list the reciprocal tariffs?

The schedule retains a heading after the action behind it stops being collected. Revision 2026HTSRev18 still prints heading 9903.01.01 imposing an additional twenty-five percent on products of Mexico, and the reciprocal rate ladder at 9903.01.43 through 9903.01.76, months after the authority for both was held invalid. A heading in the schedule is not evidence that a duty is being collected.

Can duties paid under the reciprocal tariffs be recovered?

They were collected under an authority since held invalid, which is a different position from duties collected under an action that later expired. Whether a given importer recovers turns on the posture of each entry and on the relief the courts order. The refund page states the amounts paid and reads them off a filed entry export.

Are the US reciprocal tariffs still in effect?

Q: Are the reciprocal tariffs still in effect?

No. The reciprocal schedule was imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. On 20 February 2026 the Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that the statute does not authorize tariffs, and collection ceased for entries made on or after 24 February 2026.

No. The reciprocal schedule, and every other duty imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, stopped being collected for entries made on or after 24 February 2026. The Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, No. 24-1287, decided 20 February 2026, that the statute does not authorize tariffs. The surcharge that replaced them lapsed on 24 July 2026. What is collected today rests on Sections 232, 301 and 338, and is listed below.

What stopped

Every IEEPA action, on one date.

Action	Reported under	From	Until	Status	Document
IEEPA reciprocal schedule	9903.01	2025-08-07	2026-02-24	struck down	2026-02-20
IEEPA border duties, Canada	9903.01	2025-03-04	2026-02-24	struck down	2026-02-20
IEEPA border duties, Mexico	9903.01	2025-03-04	2026-02-24	struck down	2026-02-20
IEEPA border duties, China	9903.01	2025-02-04	2026-02-24	struck down	2026-02-20

The reciprocal schedule reached 99 origins at rates from 10% to 41%, reported under 9903.01.43 through 9903.01.76 and, from August 2025, under 9903.02. The border duties on goods of Canada, Mexico and China under 9903.01.10, 9903.01.01 and 9903.01.20 ended on the same date. Customs and Border Protection deactivated the headings in ACE by CSMS 67834313. The rate each origin paid until 23 February 2026 is tabulated on the refund page.

What replaced it, and also ended

Section 122 carries a 150-day clock.

Action	Reported under	From	Until	Status	Document
Section 122 import surcharge	9903.03	2026-02-24	2026-07-24	expired	2026-02-20

Proclamation 11012 imposed a ten percent surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 four days after the decision, reported under 9903.03.01 through 9903.03.11. The statute limits a surcharge to 150 days unless Congress extends it. Congress did not, and it lapsed on 24 July 2026. It was lawfully collected while it ran, which is why it is kept apart from the IEEPA duties wherever this site counts what was paid.

What is in force

11 actions, as of 2026-09-06.

Action	Reported under	From	Until	Status	Document
Section 338 duties on goods of Canadian origin	9903.03	2026-08-22	—	in force	91 FR 46639
Section 301 forced-labor action across 60 economies	9903.05	2026-07-24	—	in force	FR Doc. 2026-15181
Section 232 semiconductors	9903.79	2026-01-15	—	in force	FR Doc. 2026-01052
Section 232 medium- and heavy-duty trucks and buses	9903.74	2025-11-01	—	in force	FR Doc. 2025-19639
Section 232 timber, lumber and wooden furniture	9903.76	2025-10-14	—	in force	FR Doc. 2025-19482
Section 232 metals: steel, aluminum and copper	9903.82	2025-06-04	—	in force	FR Doc. 2026-06960
Section 232 automobiles and parts	9903.94	2025-04-03	—	in force	FR Doc. 2025-05930
Section 301 China, list 4A	9903.88	2019-09-01	—	in force	84 FR 43304
Section 301 China, list 3	9903.88	2018-09-24	—	in force	83 FR 47974
Section 301 China, list 2	9903.88	2018-08-23	—	in force	83 FR 40823
Section 301 China, list 1	9903.88	2018-07-06	—	in force	83 FR 28710

Each adds to the Column 1 rate for the classification, on the same customs value, with the exceptions the calculation note names. The Section 301 forced-labor action and the Section 338 Canada duties are the only country-wide layers now collected; everything else is keyed to the product. The map shows the country-wide position and the actions record carries each action with its document.

Announced, not yet collectible

A start date is not a collection.

Action	Reported under	From	Until	Status	Document
Section 232 aluminum of Russian origin	9903.85	2025-06-04	—	announced	FR Doc. 2026-06960
Section 301 China four-year review: EVs, solar, batteries, medical supplies, cranes	9903.91	2024-09-27	—	announced	89 FR 76581

Why the schedule still prints them

Checked 2026-09-06 against revision 2026HTSRev18.

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule is not evidence that a duty is in force. It retains a heading after the action behind it stops being collected. Revision 2026HTSRev18 still prints heading 9903.01.01, imposing an additional twenty-five percent on products of Mexico, and still prints the reciprocal rate ladder at 9903.01.43 through 9903.01.76, months after the authority for both was held invalid.

This dataset carries 73 of those headings as retired layers, from 9903.01.01 to 9903.02.88, each with the date collection ended and the decision as its closing document. They resolve for an entry dated before 24 February 2026 and never for one dated after. Chapter 99 supplies the scope and the rate; a separately sourced status table supplies the window, and the methodology sets out how the two are kept apart.

A source that quotes the reciprocal rates as current is describing the schedule as printed rather than what is collected. The program status table is published as a download for that reason.

What the record leaves open

Stated rather than settled.

The second statutory four-year review of the Section 301 China actions is running. The continuation-request deadlines for the 2018 actions closed on 5 July and 22 August 2026 with no continuation notice published, and no notice of termination either. The duties are treated as collectible and the pages carrying them say that no document yet confirms it. The non-stacking framework in Executive Order 14289 predates the February 2026 decision and has not been restated; the legs of it that referred to IEEPA actions have nothing to act on.

Elsewhere on this site.

IEEPA tariff refunds · IEEPA tariffs and the 2026 ruling · The Section 122 surcharge · The decision, in the actions record · Effective dates

Are the reciprocal tariffs still in effect?